I’ve Been Convicted of a Crime in Civilian Court.  Can the Military Prosecute me for the Same Crime?

I’ve Been Convicted of a Crime in Civilian Court. Can the Military Prosecute me for the Same Crime?

Members of the military often believe they cannot be prosecuted in both the military courts and civilian courts. Most have heard of the concept of double jeopardy. However, civilian criminal law and the UCMJ are similar but different. In this article we discuss double jeopardy, civilian courts and the UCMJ.

Over the years we’ve had several clients call us and say they’ve been convicted of a crime in civilian court and that the military wants to prosecute then for the exact same thing. isn’t that double jeopardy? That’s a great question. You see this often in domestic violence cases and yes, the military can prosecute. The reason for this is called dual sovereignty and the Supreme Court had a case about this recently. It ruled that if federal law enforcement misses on a case the states can then pick it up. The same is true with the military and the UCMJ. If the case falls in a different area geographically and jurisdictionally then the military can pick it up.

That doesn’t sound fair, and some of the military branches including the Air Force have policies in place that prevent a military prosecutor from coming after you for the same thing you’re facing state charges for unless they get permission from the T-Jag of that particular branch.

However, policies are not law. Whether cases are accepted are not often depend on the seriousness of the offense and whether or not the military prosecutor believes the conviction was too light, whether or not they believe they could “do better,” whether or not they just want to “stack” it, and occasionally it comes down to the just not liking the military member.

The bottom line? Often military prosecutors can prosecute a crime that was tried in civilian courts. As a matter of policy they must get permission from the civilian court and if they ask they will usually get it. If you are in fact being prosecuted by the military for the same exact charges you’re being prosecuted for in the state call us at Shewmaker and Shewmaker. We can provide you with valuable information that you may not be aware of.

What is “Titling” in a Military Investigation?

What is “Titling” in a Military Investigation?

Titling occurs when a military investigative service names an individual as a subject in a criminal investigation report. It is not a judicial or legal action and does not mean an individual has been arrested, charged or convicted of a crime. The ramifications of being titled, however, can be far reaching and damaging for the service member, impacting promotional, security clearance and military assignment decisions. The titling can even impact the service member after their military career is over – impacting future civilian employment. Steve Shewmaker and Mickey Williams of the Law Firm Shewmaker & Shewmaker discuss titling, how it can impact service members and what you should do if you’ve been titled.

Should a Military Member Facing Court Martial go with Outside Counsel?

Should a Military Member Facing Court Martial go with Outside Counsel?

A court martial is the most serious trial-level military court. The decision the accused military member must make is whether to accept the military criminal defense attorney assigned to them or to hire a civilian military lawyer. The JAG attorney is similar to a civilian public defender in how they serve the accused service member, and may be less experienced than a civilian military lawyer. Steve Shewmaker and Robert Capovilla of the military defense law firm Shewmaker & Shewmaker discuss that important decision and the factors that go into it.

What is Toxic Leadership in the Military?

What is Toxic Leadership in the Military?

Toxic leadership in the military describes a combination of behaviors that can have negative effects on subordinates, missions and an organization. It can involve “self-centered attitudes, motivations and behaviors” along with lack of concern for others. It can be typified by selfish actions that “deceive, intimidate, coerce, or unfairly punish others.” Steve Shewmaker and Robert Capovilla of the Shewmaker & Shewmaker Law Firm discuss the nature of toxic leadership, the possible ramifications and when a military member needs legal representation.

Should I Meet With Investigators in a Title IX Investigation?

Should I Meet With Investigators in a Title IX Investigation?

I’m in College and Being Investigated for a Title IX Infraction. Should I Meet With the Investigators and Give My Version of the Events? Steve Shewmaker and Alexa Lewis with the Shewmaker & Shewmaker Law Firm discuss what to do and who to talk to if you find yourself the subject of a Title IX Investigation

ROTC Disenrollment Hearings: Can the Cadet Have an Attorney and What is Their Role?

ROTC Disenrollment Hearings: Can the Cadet Have an Attorney and What is Their Role?

ROTC Disenrollment Hearings are very different from a typical trial. The role of legal counsel is unusual. Unlike a separation hearing or a court martial, the attorney cannot speak at the hearing. The cadet has to do his own representation at the hearing. Steve Shewmaker and Alexa Lewis of Shewmaker & Shewmaker discuss the role of the attorney in these hearings.