What is “Titling” in a Military Investigation?

What is “Titling” in a Military Investigation?

Titling occurs when a military investigative service names an individual as a subject in a criminal investigation report. It is not a judicial or legal action and does not mean an individual has been arrested, charged or convicted of a crime. The ramifications of being titled, however, can be far reaching and damaging for the service member, impacting promotional, security clearance and military assignment decisions. The titling can even impact the service member after their military career is over – impacting future civilian employment. Steve Shewmaker and Mickey Williams of the Law Firm Shewmaker & Shewmaker discuss titling, how it can impact service members and what you should do if you’ve been titled.

Does My Good Military Character Count if I’m Charged With Sexual Assault?

Does My Good Military Character Count if I’m Charged With Sexual Assault?

These are questions we get at Shewmaker & Shewmaker every time we speak to a Soldier who is accused of sexual assault. Well…the answer is not as simple as it used to be!

Your general good military character used to be admissible in sexual assault cases if the defense could show to the military judge that there was a nexus however strained or slight, between the charged misconduct and your military service. The result was that the defense used to be able to present a “good soldier defense” in nearly every sex assault case. See United States v. Wilson, 28 M.J. 48 (C.M.A. 1989).

The “good soldier defense” was especially helpful in “he said, she said” sexual assault cases. The defense could call your commander or a soldier you deployed with to tell the court that in their opinion you’re a good soldier. The panel or military jury would hear this and hopefully conclude that you’re not the type of soldier who would sexually assault another person.

However, on 17 June 2015, the 2015 NDAA’s directive to revise M.R.E. 404 was implemented by Executive Order. These new provisions excluded the use of evidence of your general good military character to show probability of innocence for sexual assault offenses. Bad news for you, right?

Not exactly! A skilled military defense attorney knows that this change does not preclude a defense based on your good character. You may still offer evidence of your good character under M.R.E. 404(a) if those traits are relevant (pertinent) to your defense. In nearly every sexual assault via bodily harm case, for example, you will be allowed to introduce relevant character evidence such as your peacefulness towards women or your honesty (if you testify or, under certain circumstances, if the Government offers a statement you made). So, my friends, not all is lost.

Understand, however, that once your attorney offers evidence of your good character to the panel the prosecution may rebut that evidence with evidence to show that you’re not a peaceful or honest person. So, if your attorney calls a witness to testify that in his opinion your peaceful towards women than the Government could rebut that evidence by calling your ex-girlfriend who will testify that you’re not peaceful towards women. In other words, you open the door and you must face the consequences!

This article just scratches the surface of what is known as “character evidence.” However, you need to understand these rules and you need to hire an attorney who understand these rules. Character evidence can make or break a sexual assault defense. So, proceed with caution my friends and keep up the fire!

If you have any questions contact us or call us at (770) 939–1939.

Mickey Williams and the Team at Shewmaker & Shewmaker Win Big at Fort Benning, GA

Mickey Williams and the Team at Shewmaker & Shewmaker Win Big at Fort Benning, GA

22 OCT 19 – Fort Benning, GA: 

Mickey Williams and the team at Shewmaker & Shewmaker win big at Fort Benning, GA.  Our client was an E-7, 11B, with over 16 years of active duty service.  He has deployed 3 times, served in combat, and is devoted father and husband.  Our client was accused of wrongfully ingesting THC during holiday block leave.  On our recommendation, the client turns down an Article 15 and chooses trial by court-martial. Instead of giving our client his day in court, the Command elects to separate our client at a separation hearing.  During the hearing, Mickey Williams argues that the client did not intentionally ingest THC.  Mickey calls several witnesses who corroborate our client’s defense and Mickey argues that the Government did not meet their burden of proof.  Mickey calls several character witnesses to testify about our client’s good character and courage under fire.  After just 20 minutes, the Board elects to retain our client.

RESULT: Fully RETAINED    NO OTH.  Retirement saved.  Benefits kept.

Pretextual Phone Calls in Military Sexual Assault Cases

Pretextual Phone Calls in Military Sexual Assault Cases

Pretextual or pretext phone calls are used by investigators in sexual assault cases. Investigators will set up and record a phone call between the alleged victim and the suspect with the goal of soliciting an incriminating response. Steve Shewmaker and Robert Capovilla of the law firm Shewmaker & Shewmaker discuss these calls, how to recognize them and how dangerous they can be.